Matter of Gomezpacheco v. Dedios-Santiago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the Due Process Clause of course requires that the named plaintiff at all times adequately represent the interests of the absent class members”
• holding that an opt-out right is constitutionally mandated only where the class is certified under Rule 23(b)(3)
• recognizing that absent class members must be afforded adequate due process to be bound by a class action judgment
• holding that notice, opportunity to be heard, a right to opt out, and adequate representation are necessary to bind absent class members to the judgment of the rendering class action court
• holding that notice, opportunity to be heard, a right to opt out, and adequate representation are necessary to bind absent class members to the judgment of the rendering class action court
• holding that “the Due Process Clause of course requires that the named plaintiff at all times adequately represent the interests of the absent class members”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).