Matter of Gibbs v. Manhattan Democratic Party N.Y. County Democratic Comm.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a contract must “be considered as a whole and interpreted so as to harmonize and give reasonable meaning to all of its parts”
• indicating that protester must have relied on its interpretation of the solicitation when it prepared its proposal
• stating that a contract “must be considered as a whole and interpreted so as to harmonize and give reasonable meaning to all of its parts”
• explaining that interpretations should “harmonize and give reasonable meaning” to all parts of the contract, rather than “leave[] a portion of the contract useless, inexplicable, void, or superfluous”
• explaining that interpretations should “harmonize and give reasonable meaning” to all parts of the contract, rather than “leave [] a portion of the contract useless, inexplicable, void, or superfluous”
• explaining that interpretations should “harmonize and give reasonable meaning” to all parts of the contract, rather than “leave[ ] a portion of the contract useless, inexplicable, void, or superfluous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).