Matter of Freyta v. Calvin Maintenance Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court’s failure to question potential jurors about relevant news coverage did not justify overturning its finding of impartiality
• holding that United States Constitution does not require inquiry about pretrial prejudice to include specific questions regarding content of what each juror has read
• recognizing that state courts are afforded wide latitude in how they conduct voir dire
• holding that it is not a violation of the Sixth Amendment or the Due Process Clause for a judge to refuse to inquire into the venire's knowledge of the specific contents of pre-trial publicity
• holding that it is not a violation of the Sixth Amendment or the Due Process Clause for a judge to refuse to inquire into the venire's knowledge of the specific contents of pre-trial publicity
• recognizing that state courts are afforded wide latitude in how they conduct voir dire

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).