Skip to main content
· 12/19/1984

Matter of Estate of Witzke

Citations

  • 359 N.W.2d 183

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming district court’s refusal to reopen estate without addressing merits of underlying fraud claim petitioner sought to assert against administrator of estate
  • denying reopening and recognizing the “need for stability and finality in such sales is great”
  • declining to address whether the petitioners are “interested persons” when there was no proper cause for reopening the estate
  • affirming district court’s refusal to reopen estate due to practical difficulties in obtaining funds to pay petitioners, if they proved their claim, since estate assets had already been distributed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Considered by Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.