· 12/19/1984
Matter of Estate of Witzke
Citations
- 359 N.W.2d 183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming district court’s refusal to reopen estate without addressing merits of underlying fraud claim petitioner sought to assert against administrator of estate
- denying reopening and recognizing the “need for stability and finality in such sales is great”
- declining to address whether the petitioners are “interested persons” when there was no proper cause for reopening the estate
- affirming district court’s refusal to reopen estate due to practical difficulties in obtaining funds to pay petitioners, if they proved their claim, since estate assets had already been distributed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Considered by Harris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.