Skip to main content
· 8/29/1979

Matter of Estate of Kalouse

Citations

  • 282 N.W.2d 98

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that even if a scrivener’s testimony showed an intent different from that found in the will, “the heirs’ problem is the principle against varying wills by extrinsic evidence.”
  • upholding will’s language creating a class gift despite scrivener’s testimony that testator intended to make individual gifts
  • “[E]xtrinsic evidence is not admissible to vary, contradict or add to the terms of the will, or to show a different intention on the part of the testator from that disclosed by the language of the will.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Uhlenhopp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.