· 8/29/1979
Matter of Estate of Kalouse
Citations
- 282 N.W.2d 98
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that even if a scrivener’s testimony showed an intent different from that found in the will, “the heirs’ problem is the principle against varying wills by extrinsic evidence.”
- upholding will’s language creating a class gift despite scrivener’s testimony that testator intended to make individual gifts
- “[E]xtrinsic evidence is not admissible to vary, contradict or add to the terms of the will, or to show a different intention on the part of the testator from that disclosed by the language of the will.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Uhlenhopp
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.