Matter of Engelhardt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that consumer groups have standing, on behalf of their members, to challenge FTC rules that withhold used car information from consumers
• recognizing that United States “Supreme Court has held that rulemaking is substantially a function of administering and enforcing the public law ... [and] [a]s such, Congress may not create a device enabling it, or one of its houses, to control agency rulemaking”
• a similar legislative oversight mechanism contained in the Federal Trade Commission Improvements Act of 1980 was held to violate the separation of powers doctrine
• “[T]he APA expressly contemplates that notice and an opportunity to comment will be provided prior to agency decisions to repeal a rule.”
• “[T]he APA expressly contemplates that notice and an opportunity to comment will be provided prior to agency decisions to repeal a rule.”
• affirmance of decision holding unconstitutional one-house veto of Commission’s proposed rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).