Matter of Eddie S. v. Sylvia S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the nonretroactive changes to § 924(c) are not “extraordinary and compelling” reasons for purposes of § 3582(c)(1)(A)
• holding that neither the length of a lawfully imposed sentence nor non-retroactive changes in statutory sentencing law establish extraordinary and compelling circumstances for release
• holding that nonretroactive changes to sentencing laws could not constitute “extraordinary and compelling” circumstances 4 justifying compassionate relief
• holding that, on the face of the statute, nonretroactive changes could not be “extraordinary and compelling”
• holding that neither the length of a lawfully imposed sentence nor non-retroactive changes in statutory sentencing law establish extraordinary and compelling circumstances for release
• holding that a non-retroactive change in statutory sentencing law is not “extraordinary and compelling” but might be relevant in weighing the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).