Matter of DLV SR Invs., LLC v. Town of Amenia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court is only prohibited from weighing the “controverting assertions of the party seeking dismissal”
• holding that dismissal is “proper if all of the specific facts [the plaintiff] alleged collectively failed to state a prima facie case for jurisdiction under the appropriate standards”
• finding that a federal court in the Eastern District of Michigan had jurisdiction over a1 defendant from Windsor, Ontario
• holding that “in the face of a properly supported motion for dismissal, the plaintiff may not stand on his pleadings but must, by affidavit or otherwise, set forth specific facts showing that the court has jurisdiction”
• holding that “in the face of a properly supported motion for dismissal, the plaintiff may not stand on his pleadings but must, by affidavit or otherwise, set forth specific facts showing that the court has jurisdiction”
• holding that “in the face of a properly supported motion for dismissal, the plaintiff may not stand on his pleadings but must, by affidavit or otherwise, set forth specific facts showing that the court has jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).