Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Beaver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an offensive personality claim must relate to conduct that reflects adversely on a person's fitness as a lawyer
• concluding that an ethical rule was not unconstitutionally vague because its prohibition was “understandable by a person who has been licensed as an officer of the court,” keeping in mind “[t]he context in which [the] provision is promulgated and the cases to which it has been applied”
• upholding Wisconsin's \offensive personality\ statute against a similar vagueness challenge in part because of the context in which the phrase is used and the knowledge of ethical standards imputed to attorneys
• upholding Wisconsin’s “offensive personality” statute against a similar vagueness challenge in part because of the context in which the phrase is used and the knowledge of ethical standards imputed to attorneys

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).