Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Schafer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a whistle-blower statute did not protect an attorney from disciplinary action for unnecessarily revealing client confidences to newspapers and the press
• noting that a whistle-blower statute did not protect an attorney from disciplinary action for unnecessarily revealing client confidences to newspapers and the press
• even if disclosure required, court can still restrict disclosures to only those matters necessary for court proceedings
• even if disclosure required, court can still restrict disclosures to only those matters necessary for court proceedings
• finding additional mitigating factors beyond those found by hearings officer
• “ ‘[NJaked castings into the constitutional sea are not sufficient to command judicial consideration and discussion.’ ” (internal quotation marks omitted) (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Blilie, 132 Wn.2d 484, 493 n.2, 939 P.2d 691 (1997))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).