Matter of Dickerson v. Hart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that any individual right to consular notification is not a “fundamental right” whose violation warrants dismissal of indictment
• attorney not ineffective for failing to make motion where no circuit had held such a motion to be valid
• \ Even if we assume arguendo that De La Pava had judicially enforceable rights under the Vienna Convention-a position we do not adopt-the Government's failure to comply with the consular-notification provision is not grounds for dismissal of the indictment\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).