Matter of Darrett v. Annucci

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that agency law determines TCPA \sender\ liability as articulated in Bridgeview
• holding vicarious liability cannot be established where the challenged action was in contrast to the principal’s orders
• we review jury instructions de novo to determine whether they fairly and accurately summarized the law
• we review jury instructions de novo to determine whether they fairly and accurately summa‐ rized the law
• Because the alleged agent “expressly contradicted defendant’s actual instructions, this is clearly not express actual agency.”
• “Although the literal language of the regulation suggests that such a result is possible, . . . to be liable as a sender, a person must have done something to advertise goods or services.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).