Matter of Darling v. Darling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that school's refusal to allow religious organization to use facilities was based on content, not viewpoint
• “Taking first the reasonableness criterion, the Club argues that the restriction is unreasonable .... This argument is foreclosed by precedent”
• Good News argues that \to exclude the Club because it teaches morals and values from a Christian perspective constitutes unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination\
• \The crux of the Good News Club's argument is that the Milford school's application of the Community Use Policy to exclude the Club from its facilities is not viewpoint neutral\
• the Club's \teachings may involve secular values such as obedience or resisting jealousy\
• the Club’s “teachings may involve secular values such as obedience or resisting jealousy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).