Matter of Cyrus v. O'Neill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding attorney’s motion to withdraw should have been granted because it would not “have harmed the efficiency of the judicial system” as the trial date had not been set and there were no dispositive motions before the court
• “an attorney may ethically withdraw” (with 10 leave of court) “if the client will not be hurt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).