Matter of Curry-Malcolm v. New York State Div. of Human Rights

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant exercised dominion and control over vehicle that was regularly parked where defendant resided and had stereo system that defendant altered for his benefit
• in interpreting G.L.c. 94C, federal law is guiding since the statute is modeled on the Comprehensive Federal Drug and Control Act, 21 U.S.C. §881
• “[t]he theory of law on which by assent a case is tried cannot be disregarded when the case comes before an appellate court for review”
• “The theory of law on which by assent a case is tried cannot be disregarded when the case comes before an appellate court for review . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).