Matter of Clarke v. Veolia Transp. Servs., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that trustee’s motion for relief from judgment or order failed to raise any issues not already addressed by its motion to amend
• holding trustee’s six-month delay in seeking to amend its answer after its unilateral set-off of the funds constituted undue delay
• “allowing summary judgment because “[n]o commercial relationship ever existed between the parties; their only contact occurred in the context of this litigation” ”
• denying motion to amend trustee answer where trustee neither possessed nor controlled the funds indicated in its initial answer because of undue prejudice
• applying issue preclusion to later-fled case despite fact that clerk did not make docket entry required by Mass.R.Civ.P. 79(a)
• dismissing 93A claim where no commercial relationship ever existed between the plaintiff and a bank which was brought into suit under trustee process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).