Matter of Cha v. New York State Indus. Bd. of Appeals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiff was estopped because claim was \directly contrary\ to previous claim
• holding plaintiff was estopped because claim was “directly contrary” to previous claim
• reviewing judge's decision to invoke judicial estoppel in order granting motion to dismiss for abuse of discretion
• reversing judicial estoppel order on this ground

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).