Matter of Cane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• contrasting the facts in Bumpers with those in other cases where the defendants did not try to leave the premises but instead “acknowledged and spoke with them”
• stating that defendant's evasive conduct was one of several factors justifying a stop when the defendant also was outside a shopping center where many shootings and drug arrests occurred and he was standing in a manner and location that suggested he was trespassing
• walking away at a fast pace upon noticing a patrol car
• “Bumpers’s attempt to dodge the police created suspicion in a way that was not present in [previous cases].”
• officers had reasonable and particularized suspicion that someone was trespassing when seen loitering in a high-crime area of a shopping center, without shopping bags, in front of a sign that said “no trespassing”
• officers had reasonable and particularized suspicion that someone was trespassing when seen loitering in a high-crime area of a shopping center, without shopping bags, in front of a sign that said “no trespassing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).