Matter of Birro v. Wolkow-Braker Roofing Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that 18 U.S.C. § 3664 “requires both that a district court set forth its reasons in resolving a dispute over restitution and that a restitution award . . . be adequately supported by evidence in the record.”
• finding a spreadsheet of doubtful accuracy and offered without sworn statements explaining its entries to be insufficient under the Waknine standard
• suggesting in dicta that § 2259(c) would not cover a minor victim’s legal guardian acting outside of her capacity as a legal guardian
• vacating order when court provided no reasoning and only evidence was irregular spreadsheet
• interpreting holding in Waknine, 543 F.3d at 566

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).