Skip to main content
· 7/16/1992

Matter of Beaubouef

Citations

  • 966 F.2d 174
  • 23 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 242
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 16071
  • 1992 WL 145751

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding \[a]n implied amendment of the pleadings will not be permitted where it results in substantial prejudice to a party\
  • upholding finding that debtor had requisite intent to deceive where debtor’s schedules contained multiple falsehoods, and debtor did not remedy falsehoods when he filed amended schedules
  • “False oaths sufficient to justify the denial of discharge include ... a false statement or omission in the debtor’s schedules”
  • “It makes no difference that [the debtor] does not intend to injure his creditors when he makes a false statement. Creditors are entitled to judge for themselves what will benefit, and what will prejudice, them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.