Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Shin)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “necessary connection” between the illegal search at issue and the defendant’s later confession was missing in part because the search “produced no evidence whatsoever”
• holding that a suspect was not in custody where he was “repeatedly told” that he was not under arrest and was free to leave
• holding that a suspect was not in custody where he was “repeatedly told” that he was not under arrest and was free to leave
• holding that an interrogation at an FBI office was not custodial because, inter alia, the defendant was told he was free to leave and “was, in fact, returned home at the end of the interview”
• holding that an interrogation at an FBI office was not custodial because, inter alia, the defendant was told he was free to leave and “was, in fact, returned home at the end of the interview”
• noting that a suspect is not in custody when, inter alia, “he does in fact leave without hindrance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).