Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Patrie)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “it is essential that we place the words of a statute in their proper context by resort to the legislative history,” includ- ing related congressional activity addressing the same subject matter
• stating that “it is essential that we place the words of a statute in their proper context by resort to the legislative history,” including related con- gressional activity addressing the same subject matter
• noting that an “interlocutory appeal under [Section] 1292(b) is subject to the decision of the court of appeals in the exercise of its discretion, to allow appeal of the question certified by the district court”
• noting that an “interlocutory appeal under [Section] 1292(b) is subject to the decision of the court of appeals in the exercise of its discretion, to allow appeal of the question certified by the district court”
• finding the “final judgment” of 15 U.S.C.A. § 29 to include a “controlling question” appealed under 28 U.S.C. A. § 1292(b)
• stating “a well-established principle governing the interpretation of provisions altered in the 1948 revision is that ‘no change is to be presumed unless clearly expressed’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).