Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Kabir)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that showing of witness unavailability was not required under Confrontation Clause for admission of out-of-court statements made by co-conspirators
• holding that confrontation clause did not require showing of unavailability of declarant as a condition to admission of out-of-court statements of non-testifying coconspirator
• eliminating requirement to show unavailability as a condition for the admission of out-of-court statement of a nontestifying co-conspirator

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).