· 1/13/1978
Matter of Appeal in Pima County Etc.
Citations
- 575 P.2d 310
- 118 Ariz. 111
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In considering the evidence it is well settled that an appellate court will not substitute its own opinion for that of the trial court.” (citation omitted)
- “In considering the evidence it is well settled that an appellate court will not substitute its own opinion for that of the trial court.” (citation omitted)
- “In considering the evidence it is well settled that an appellate court will not substitute its own opinion for that of the trial court.” (citation omitted)
- “In considering the evidence it is well settled that an appellate court will not substitute its own opinion for that of the trial court.” (citation omitted)
- “In considering the evidence it is well settled that an appellate court will not substitute its own opinion for that of the trial court.” (citation omitted)
- “In considering the evidence it is well settled that an appellate court will not substitute its own opinion for that of the trial court.” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holohan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.