Matter of Alexis TT. (Andrea VV.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• testifying expert identified spent casing introduced in evidence “as the one returned to the local police after ballistics testing was performed on the gun”
• court finds error in admitting ballistics certificate without testimony to be “harmless beyond a reasonable doubt” in light of “overwhelming evidence independent of the ballistics certificate that the gun in question was operable”
• where officer identified spent casing as one returned to police after ballistics testing was performed on gun — even though he did not personally check weapon — his testimony regarding ballistics analysis allowed jury to infer that gun fired when tested

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).