Matter of Alejandro F.C. v. Alexis O.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a sentence below the guidelines range was not substantively unreasonable notwithstanding the defendant’s “lack of criminal history” in part because of “the gravity” of the defendant’s conduct
• reiterating that a district court “is entitled to substantial latitude” when weighing the § 3553(a) factors
• Eighth Circuit precedent “recognizes the compulsive nature of the crime of possession of child pornography and the well-established hoarding habits of child pornography collectors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).