Matter of Akayla M. (Marie M.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, although the Alabama courts had improperly reasoned that the petitioner’s adaptive strengths outweighed his deficits, this approach was acceptable until Moore
• “The Supreme Court’s decision in Atkins did not define what it means to be intellectually disabled, instead leaving that task to the states.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).