Matter of Acosta v. Melendez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that a government contract is void only where the government entity “had no authority to enter the contract in the first place”
• indicating that a government contract is void only where the government entity \had no authority to enter the contract in the first place\
• indicating that a government contract is void only where the government entity \had no authority to enter the contract in the first place\
• “If the transaction was truly void, as our cases recognize, it would be subject to challenge and invalidation at any time, perhaps years later.”
• non-GMA and non-SEPA case where procedural error did not render the sale of state land ultra vires
• non-GMA and non-SEPA case where procedural error did not render the sale of state land ultra vires

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).