Matter of 301 E. 66th St. Condominium Corp. v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the different staleness inquiry applicable in cases involving images of sex offenses against children
• stating “the very nature of the evidence sought may suggest that probable cause is not diminished solely by the passage of time”
• finding search warrant not stale even though “the criminal activity alleged in the warrant is not ongoing in nature, nor the evidence sought intrinsically likely to remain at the location where it was originally observed”
• finding search warrant not stale even though “the criminal activity alleged in the warrant is not ongoing in nature, nor the evidence sought intrinsically likely to remain at the location where it was originally observed”
• “[E]vidence seized pursuant to a warrant supported by ‘stale’ probable cause is not admissible in a criminal trial to establish the defendant’s guilt.”
• \[E]vidence seized pursuant to a warrant supported by `stale' probable cause is not admissible in a criminal trial to establish the defendant's guilt.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).