Mattas v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the government of the Commonwealth [includes] the courts and other offices and agencies of the unified judicial system . . .”
• “[T]he Office of the Disciplinary Counsel, as an entity, [is an] arm of the state and therefore cannot be sued.”
• “The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, and the Office of the Disciplinary Counsel, as an entity, are arms of the state and therefore cannot be sued.”
• post-Monell case held Pennsylvania is not “person”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).