Skip to main content
· 4/15/2015

Matt v. HSBC Bank, USA N.A.

Citations

  • 783 F.3d 368
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 6151
  • 2015 WL 1681482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that mootness can be raised by the court on its own initiative even when the issue is not raised by the parties
  • noting that mootness can be raised by the court on its own initiative even when the issue is not raised by the parties
  • “Mootness is a jurisdictional matter. Consequently, it can be raised by a federal court sua sponte.” (citations omitted)
  • “[I]f a court may not provide ‘any “effectual relief” to the potentially prevailing party,’ the case is moot.” (quoting Horizon Bank & Tr. v. Massachusetts, 391 F.3d 48, 53 (1st Cir. 2004))
  • “[I]f a court may not provide ‘any “effectual relief” to the potentially prevailing party,’ the case is moot.” (quoting Horizon Bank & Tr. v. Massachusetts, 391 F.3d 48, 53 (1st Cir. 2004))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Howard, Kayatta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.