Skip to main content
· 8/27/2013

Matt v. HSBC Bank

Citations

  • 968 F. Supp. 2d 351
  • 2013 WL 4854481
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding requests for personnel files of employees who worked on plaintiff's claim ‘overbroad, and seek[ing] information that is unnecessarily invasive’
  • finding requests for personnel files of employees who worked on plaintiff's claim ‘overbroad, and seek[ing] information that is unnecessarily invasive’
  • denying motion to compel discovery of past claims in bad faith action against insurer
  • characterizing insured’s request for “the personnel files of every Allstate employee who worked on [his] claims” as “unnecessarily invasive,” and holding that insured “should seek the information that [he] needs by a less invasive means, such as by deposition”
  • company's claims manuals and training materials were to be kept confidential

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.