Matsushita Electronics Corp. v. Loral Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding letters sent by patent holder to possible infringers to be protected as “reasonably attendant upon effective litigation,” even though no law suit was ever filed against them
• patent holder’s letters to potential infringers warning them of possible infringement were protected under Noerr

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).