Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ‘“.the ordinary consequences of antidumping duty procedures do not constitute irreparable harm.’”
• finding of irreparable injury was “clearly erroneous” when based on “having to comply with Commerce’s demands for data and verification” because “ordinary consequences of Consol. Court No. 12-00087 Page 35 antidumping duty procedures do not constitute irreparable harm”
• In order for a preliminary injunction to issue plaintiff must show (1) likelihood of success on the merits; (2) the balance of hardship is in favor of plaintiff; (3) the public interest will be served by the relief requested; and (4) immediate and irreparable injury.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).