Skip to main content
· 1/26/1999

Matson v. Strickland (In Re Strickland)

Citations

  • 230 B.R. 276
  • 41 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 941
  • 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 169
  • 33 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1199
  • 1999 WL 98991

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that because the trustee only relied on debtor’s schedules to prove insolvency where they only spoke to solvency on the petition date, the trustee did not carry her burden
  • observing that “whenever it is possible, a determination of insolvency should be based on seasonable appraisals or expert testimony”
  • “[e]vidence of insolvency on the date of the alleged fraudulent transfer is the critical issue and proof of insolvency on any other date is insufficient”
  • considering Debtor’s schedules because they were the only proof offered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackwell N. Shelley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.