Skip to main content
· 12/7/2001

Matrix Essentials, Inc. v. Harmon Stores, Inc.

Citations

  • 205 F. Supp. 2d 779
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23946
  • 2001 WL 1877362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Although the decision to enter into a settlement agreement rather than [sic] persist in litigation is arguably a business decision, Matrix must show that Harmon transacted business in Ohio in order to meet the requirements of the long arm statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wells

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.