Matranga v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging the continued validity of the general rule discussed in Slicer v. Quigley, supra, 180 Conn. 255 -56
• affirming conviction where defendant delivered drugs to victim who later died after ingesting them
• manslaughter when death occurs “under circumstances evincing an extreme indifference to human life”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).