Matra Americas, LLC v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the court will not automatically deny a motion pending further discovery for failure to file a Rule 56(f) affidavit as long as outstanding discovery requests and opposition motions identify the information sought with specificity
• noting that this affidavit requirement helps “prevent fishing expeditions”
• noting that this affidavit requirement helps “prevent fishing expeditions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).