Matos v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the finding that defendant’s “sexual conduct with the victim was not consensual is not supported by competent, substantial evidence”
• “[T]he court must set forth the basis of its determination.” (citing Clark v. State, 95 So.3d 986, 989 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Matos v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-12-31· cited 3×
• State v. Caragol
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-06· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-08-07· cited 6×
• Clark v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-08-22· cited 6×
• Simmons v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-31· cited 1×