· 12/14/1988
Matos v. Kurz-Hastings, Inc.
Citations
- 701 F. Supp. 1135
- 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14127
- 1988 WL 136613
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding loan participation not an investment because the loan was secured by collateral and repayment was not conditioned on the success of the borrower's business
- indicating the interrelated character of the Howey test and the commercial-investment dichotomy approach
- indicating the interrelated character of the Howey test and the commercial-investment dichotomy approach
- applying “investment contracts” test to determine boundaries of commercial-investment note dichotomy
- loan for acquisition of controlling stock interest in a bank
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Broderick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.