Skip to main content
· 12/14/1988

Matos v. Kurz-Hastings, Inc.

Citations

  • 701 F. Supp. 1135
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14127
  • 1988 WL 136613

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding loan participation not an investment because the loan was secured by collateral and repayment was not conditioned on the success of the borrower's business
  • indicating the interrelated character of the Howey test and the commercial-investment dichotomy approach
  • indicating the interrelated character of the Howey test and the commercial-investment dichotomy approach
  • applying “investment contracts” test to determine boundaries of commercial-investment note dichotomy
  • loan for acquisition of controlling stock interest in a bank

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Broderick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.