Matos v. Department of Business and Professional Regulation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that disability determinations of other entities are relevant to disability rulings made by the SSA
• stating that disability determinations of other entities are relevant to disability rulings made by the SSA
• reversing the Commissioner’s decision where the ALJ failed to fully investigate and make explicit findings about the actual physical demands, including the required use of the hands and wrists, of a clerical position
• claimant’s desire to retire early due to job dissatisfaction does not detract from the reliability of her physician’s opinion based on medically acceptable clinical and diagnostic data
• physical and mental demands of claimant’s past relevant work are to be compared with what claimant is capable of doing
• “A comparison of a claimant’s residual functional capacity with the actual functional demands of her particular former work is essential to a determination that she is able to perform her past relevant work.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).