Matos Ortiz v. Com. of Puerto Rico

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[c]onsiderable authority construing Law 17 and the closely analogous Law 100 suggests that neither Law 17 nor Law 69 supports a cause of action against individual defendants”
• making same observation as to Laws 17, 69, and 100, and concluding that \Law 17 and Law 69 are . . . to be interpreted in pari materia with Law 100\
• noting Law 17 supports sexual harassment and retaliation claims
• individual liability does not lie under Title VII
• individual liability does not lie under Title VII

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).