Mato v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court found that failure to afford the defendant adequate time to confer with his counsel appointed at the hearing constituted one of the grounds for holding that the defendant was denied due process at his probation revocation hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Singletary v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-03-06· cited 55×
• Stevenson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-09-13· cited 4×
• Sukert v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-01-13· cited 3×
• J.S. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-17· cited 2×
• Youngs v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-03-30· cited 1×
• Pitchford v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-12-01· cited 1×
• Knapp v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-04-10· cited 1×
• JS v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-17
• Kelly v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-04-19

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hampton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-05-02· cited 15×
• Eddins v. Eddins
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-06-12· cited 1×