Matlock v. Weets

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming injunction against plaintiffs former boyfriend based on the “negative psychological impact” of the defendant’s actions on the plaintiff despite absence of “actual assault or verbal physical threat”
• affirming permanent injunction enjoining former boyfriend from stalking and harassing the plaintiff
• affirming permanent injunction enjoining former boyfriend from stalking and harassing the plaintiff
• “A request for an injunction invokes the court’s equitable jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).