Matlock, Marcus Dewayne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a factual-sufficiency review applies to issues where the burden of proof is by a preponderance of the evidence because that standard is the same used in various civil proceedings
• recognizing that a factual- sufficiency review applies to issues where the burden of proof is by a preponderance of the evidence because that standard is the same used in various civil proceedings
• recognizing that a factual- sufficiency review applies to issues where the burden of proof is by a preponderance of the evidence because that standard is the same used in various civil proceedings
• recognizing that a factual- sufficiency review applies to issues where the burden of proof is by a preponderance of the evidence because that standard is the same used in various civil proceedings
• recognizing that a factual- sufficiency review applies to issues where the burden of proof is by a preponderance of the 26 evidence because that standard is the same used in various civil proceedings
• holding Brooks v. State did not change the traditional legal and factual standards of review for affirmative defenses proved by a preponderance of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).