· 11/4/2013
Matkin v. Barett
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 513
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 366
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3257
- 571 U.S. 989
- 2013 WL 3865902
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7972
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “filing an EEOC charge does not toll the time for filing state tort claims, including those that arise out of the same nucleus of facts alleged in the charge of discrimination filed with the EEOC”
- “filing an EEOC charge does not toll the time for filing state tort claims, including those 19 that arise out of the same nucleus of facts alleged in the charge of discrimination filed with the 20 EEOC.”
- “Because Congress did not intend for the filing of a charge of discrimination with the EEOC to toll the statute of limitations applicable to state tort claims, we . . . conclude[e] that lodging a charge of discrimination with the EEOC does not toll those state claims.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.