Skip to main content
· 11/27/1992

Matias Aviles v. Donald Kunkle, D/b/a, Kunkle Farms, and Richard Kunkle

Citations

  • 978 F.2d 201
  • 978 F.3d 201
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 31055
  • 1992 WL 328654

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that to exercise specific jurisdiction, defendants’ forum contacts that are asserted as basis for jurisdiction must be related to subject matter of controversy
  • holding that the FLSA is silent on service of process
  • explaining that a defendant’s amenability to personal jurisdiction in an FLSA action case is determined by the forum state’s long-arm statute (citations omitted)
  • finding one telephone call and one letter into the forum state insufficient to justify exercising personal jurisdiction over the defendant.
  • if Congress did not provide for nationwide service of process, it cannot be inferred
  • if Congress did not provide for nationwide service of process, it cannot be inferred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Johnson, Duhé

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.