Matias Aveja v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiffs’ injury theory rested on the “unsupportable inferences” that airlines would have continued offering Boeing MAX 8 flights, despite public knowledge of their defects, and also that they would be doing so for lower prices—both of which the court found “implausible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).