Skip to main content

Mathis v. State

Citations

  • 291 Ga. 268
  • 728 S.E.2d 661
  • 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 1997
  • 2012 WL 2369407
  • 2012 Ga. LEXIS 625

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant’s failure to object or join in a co-defendant’s objection to an issue bars the defendant from raising the issue on appeal
  • holding that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the defendant’s convictions where, among other things, testimony established that he used a nickname that had been linked to the crimes
  • addressing improper testimony that “was based not on [the witness’s] personal knowledge but rather on hearsay”
  • addressing improper testimony that “was based not on [the witness’s] personal knowledge but rather on hearsay”
  • addressing improper testimony that “was based not on [the witness’s] personal knowledge but rather on hearsay”
  • victim’s statements to his friend, who testified he was a confidant of and mentor to victim, were admissible under necessity exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.