Skip to main content

Mathis v. State

Citations

  • 63 Fla. 21

Syllabus

<p>1. In a criminal prosecution for murder where the defendant is a witness and is asked by his counsel if prior to that time he had ever been charged with any violation of law or had any trouble, such questions may be excluded when their relevancy is not shown, since they go to particular facts not in issue and not to the general reputation of the defendant.</p> <p>2. An .affidavit in support of a ground of a motion for new trial should be evidenced to the appellate court by being incorporated in the bill of exceptions.</p> <p>3. Where there is ample evidence to sustain a verdict and there is nothing to indicate that the jury was not governed by the evidence, the verdict will not be disturbed.</p>

Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.